suni-masuno

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/23/us/23porn.html?_r=1 As per the new yourk times link above the Supreme Court of the United States has removed the last law that limits the showing of sexually explicit and otherwise "obscene" materials online. They cited it as an unconstitutional restriction of free speach. The availability of filtering software for parents was also a major factor. For the first major time in my memory the responsibility for keeping certain content away from kids has shifted from producers/hosts of said content (like myself or deviant art for example) square onto the shoulders of parent. The Supreme Court has embraced, for o

Well there goes my first removed submission from DA. Not that I'm really surprised at all. I suppose my ideas about art aren't really something that is considered acceptable to many. I want to do sexually explicit art. Could I say anything worse in the world? I don't want to do political art. I don't want to do subversive or supportive art. I'm not looking to talk about the horrible parts of the world, of myself, of anything. I'm actually looking to do the exact opposite. I want to do art about happiness. About things in life I enjoy, and about pleasure and enjoyment and about beauty itself. This doesn't really seem to be easily accepted

All images I post to deviant art are released to the public domain. this is per myself and all models I use. Thus no entity (myself included) my own any rights or establish any restrictions on these works. This is because I am personally a believer that there is more to be gained from sharing information than trying to control it. I personally embrace the notion that no thought, idea, or data should be owned. I don't hold others to these standards. I would be thankful to see other people embracing similar beliefs, but am not trying to force it on anyone else. If anyone wants to create derivative works of mine by photo manipulation or by sim